Posts Tagged ‘New York Times’

Big Pub Panics over Changing Business Model

Monday, October 17th, 2011

Today’s New York Times has an article about the panic among conventional publishers over Amazon.com beginning to publish:

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/17/technology/amazon-rewrites-the-rules-of-book-publishing.html?ref=technology

In the Amazon business model, there’s no advance, and often no agent, although some agents are beginning to participate as publishers.  I have to say that my sympathy for the big commercial publishers  (not that Amazon isn’t or won’t be one soon) is very limited.  They dropped me unceremoniously 25 years ago– well, not entirely true, that was Scribner’s.  My last big publisher was HarperCollins for the Marco kid books, and that was only fifteen years ago– anyhow, the bottom line is, Conventional publishers dropped me and a lot of my friends– mid-list and literary writers of high repute and great accomplishment– and we’ve been scrambling ever since.  I’ve used small presses, nonprofit presses, university presses, cooperative presses:  I’ve published with all of these, as well as with Scribner’s and HarperCollins, and had Sc & HC been more nurturing of me when I was not a best seller for them, I might be less ready to embrace the Great Change going on now with ebooks and self publishing.  There are myriad problems including, at the very least, who are the gatekeepers, but also vast opportunities.  And for me, a lot of fun too.  The opportunities include simply being able to make books available to people who who might want to read them– miniscule numbers beside what bestseller oriented publishers except, but human beings, readers, communication.  I have been having a great time with my various ventures.

Romance Novels are going Electronic

Thursday, December 9th, 2010

Today’s New York Times has an interesting article about how romance novels are the fastest growing e-book market.

Now that I’ve decided on Kindle, Google sells e-books

Monday, December 6th, 2010

It’s not that any of the behemoth companies are good guys, but I do have a principled preference for opener sources– however, when I held a Kindle in the Staples store, it felt right: so slim and neutral.  I liked the Nook, but in the end, not the color.

But now, Google is starting to work with independent stores to make selling e-books simple:  here’s the New York Times article about it: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/07/business/media/07ebookstore.html?emc=eta1

Whatever!

Reversal of Fortunes?

Thursday, August 12th, 2010

Is Barnes & Noble in trouble and the remaining private bookstores in a better position to handle physical books in the age of e-books?  See what the New York Times thinks.

New Uses for Old Books?

Monday, August 9th, 2010

The New York Times Magazine gets cute with an essay called “Creative New Uses for Books.”

Plagiarism versus Sampling

Monday, August 2nd, 2010

Today’s New York Times has a piece about students who don’t know that they should, according to university standards and custom, credit Wikipedia for quoted paragraphs  even though Wikipedia is a group written source.  The piece ends with more conventional cases of students who simply, in order to get their degree and get on with life, use papers written by others– old fashioned plagiarism and paper buying.

But much more interesting to me is the first group, the ones accustomed  to “saving” images off the web (I do this) and to downloading music and movies– a whole host of materials from the web that we  consider fair game for fair use.

The piece suggests that young people raised in this world, themselves perhaps participants in the great group writing project of Wikipedia, really see quotation from sources in a different way from a previous generation with perhaps a different view of self and individuality.

Our Brains on Multi-Task

Monday, June 7th, 2010

According to today’s New York Times, our brains are being reformatted (our vocabularies too) by our devices, gadgets and, especially, our propensity for multi-tasking: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/07/technology/07brain.html?ref=todayspaper .  For the record, I read this on large sheets of dead tree material at my kitchen table over coffee and Crispix.

Reading More into the Future of Reading

Tuesday, March 2nd, 2010

Riding the train into New York last evening to teach my NYU novel writing class, I was wishing for an e-reader, as I often do  (I was already carrying my little Acer netbook so I could check email later).  Then– as I even more often do, I drifted into a nap, so I don’t know if the desire for all the books in my library in my hand at every moment was just part of a pleasant dream or a real plan.

The irony of course is the hundreds of  people who want to write novels, and are they reading novels? The National Book Critics Circle blog Critical Mass has a nice meditation on the difference between reading blogs and really reading, and Shelley Ettinger pointed me toward an article in the blog on the state of publishing, Moby Lives, about who is actually using e-books at the present time (more men than women, higher income than lower).

She also gave me the link to an article in Poets and Writers magazine about the Espresso Book Machine .  This hundred thousand dollar plus machine will print a digitalized book instantly– they’ve been in development for a couple of years, and this article touches on several issues about the future of reading:  the instant hard copy books but also e-books  (and the fascinating fact that one of the developers of the Espresso is Jason Epstein who was also part of the development of paperback books in the early 1950′s!).  I like the possibility of small independent bricks-and-mortar stores around the world that have access to all the books–  I’m visualizing a little coffee shop place with only a few hard copy books, but free wifi and one of the Espresso Book Machines, and people reading and writing, and maybe even looking at shelved books.  Nice, don’t you think?  Or at any rate, not bad.

Universities have been picking up on the possibility of  instant books much  faster than the dinosaurs I mean the publishing industry, which is busy justifying their high prices as in an article in the March 1, 2010  New York Times. They don’t mention that part of the overhead for their books is not just underpaid editorial staff but also the corporate CEO’s Lear Jet.  See my article reviewing The Business of Books.